It is battle between land power and sea power which is going to lead the world continents by one. What is Heartland theory? This theory explains,greatest wealth. Mackinder’s Heartland Theory: Mackinder gave this theory in This theory regards political history as a continuous struggle between land and sea powers. The final tradition informing geopolitical thought in Russia today is the celebrated “Heartland” theory of the British geographer and statesman. Halford Mackinder.

Author: Voodooshura Golrajas
Country: Laos
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Technology
Published (Last): 25 April 2008
Pages: 371
PDF File Size: 6.73 Mb
ePub File Size: 11.98 Mb
ISBN: 352-8-47243-139-1
Downloads: 61480
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Arazragore

Mackinder’s “Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland Mackinder did not consider the effect of modern technology on his theory.

The Heartland Theory is seen by critics as impractical ueartland a modern perspective. However, the roles of both the Intermediate Region and the Heartland are regarded by their respective authors as being pivotal in the shaping of world history. But throughout the nineteenth century:. Retrieved from ” https: The combined empire’s large East Asian coastline would also provide the potential for it to become a major sea power.

He divided Europe into east and west by a line joining the Adriatic to the Baltic. Learn how and when to remove these template messages.

Mackinder’s Heartland Theory – Explained!

This page was last updated on September 26, By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

While the Heartland Theory was drafted in the early 20th century, before the world was plunged into the two World Wars and a Cold War soon after that, some scholars can link recent events of the 21st century as examples of the Heartland Theory in action. This concept is an analysis of the political pattern of the world and includes predictions based on this analysis. Signs of Mackinder’s Heartland Theory can be found in the works of geopolitician Dimitri Kitsikisparticularly in his ” Intermediate Region ” model.


Gadzhev, in his book Vvedenie v geopolitiku Introduction to Geopolitics raises a series of objections to Mackinder’s Heartland to start with that the significance physiography is given there for political hertland is a form of geographical determinism.

Halford Mackinder was a 20th-century geopolitical scholar who is attributed for writing the Heartland Theory. Mackinder saw it as a high point of communication system capable of uniting the whole Heartland into theorg cohesive unit. Volga, Oxus, Jaxartes or into the tgeory sea e. January Learn how and when to remove this template message. Mackinder identified the geopolitical nightmare that was to haunt the world’s two sea powers during the mac,inder half of the twentieth century— Great Britain and, later the Theoru States.

The Geographical Pivot of History

Obi, Yenisei, Lena which drain into the Arctic Sea. This question may seem pointless, since in the Russian Empire had ruled most of the area from the Volga to Eastern Siberia for centuries.

The islands of Japan and the British Isles were categorized under the offshore islands. That never actually happened.

Halford stated that the Heartland was made up of the territory originally occupied by the Russian Empire and by the Soviet Union soon after that except for the Kamchatka Peninsula. Also, China later went on to join makcinder communist sphere, while the Saudi Arabia-Sahara barrier could not prevent the Cold War from spilling over into Africa.

Mackinder died on March 6th,aged 86 years.

The outlying islands were made up of the Americas as well as Australia. This Heartland was perceived as the greatest natural fortress on earth surrounded on all sides by geographical mackiinder. November Learn how and when to remove this template message.


Mackinder gave this theory in This article has multiple issues.

The reason for this difference is that Mackinder’s model is primarily geo-strategic, while Kitsikis’ model is geo-civilizational. During the time thelry the writing of the Heartland Theory, most of East Europe and Russia did not have an inch of road or railway network, making the belief of conquering the Heartland logistically impossible.

Mackinder wrote down the theory in the turn of the 20th century, a period when modern technological advancements were still in their infancy.

Mackinder believed that countries from other world regions the offshore islands and the outlying islands were hindered from making a successful invasion in the Heartland by the geographical barriers surrounding the Heartland the Carpathian Mountains to the west, the Hindukush Ranges to the South, and the Altai to the east and the Baltic Sea to the north.

Halford John Mackinderthe author.

The Geographical Pivot of History – Wikipedia

This assertion was also supported by Kjellen. This theory regards political history as a continuous struggle between land and sea powers with the ultimate victory going to the continental power.

World-Island was also the richest of the three world regions in resources. The other landmasses would follow later.