Titre d’un poème de P. Celan, Schibboleth sert ici de fil conducteur pour la lecture de celui que l’on considère comme l’un des plus grands poètes de langue . Schibboleth: Für Paul Celan. Front Cover. Jacques Derrida. Passagen-Verlag, – pages Bibliographic information. QR code for Schibboleth. Schibboleth: para Paul Celan by Jacques Derrida, , available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide.

Author: Taujas Yozshum
Country: French Guiana
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Music
Published (Last): 7 March 2017
Pages: 102
PDF File Size: 15.11 Mb
ePub File Size: 14.2 Mb
ISBN: 513-1-56987-279-4
Downloads: 32382
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gardalkis

For what is a date? AM rated it it was amazing May 27, I don’t see how I, for one, can formulate the question in these terms. They philosophize as if nothing has happened. But he has no need of the Shoah for this either. Kevin Holden rated it it was amazing Jan 30, The idea of the name to be given to what is called for the sake of convenience: As if the names were really the very thing that the extermination was aimed at.

People like Plato, Kant, Hegel will have done everything so that the systematicity of their discourse would be able to do without any reference to the proper name of the signatory, to the date of their production etc.

Interview With Professor Jacques Derrida, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris

The World Holocaust Remembrance Center. There is a text entitled Survivre, and in it I try to note that surviving is neither life nor death, and I demonstrate in what a certain concept of survival resists, does not allow itself to be reduced to the opposition of life and death.

Even if, once again, the uniqueness of this reference is a problem for me. Are there any significant differences between the work of, say, Levinas and that of Jankelevitch? Naturally, at the same time, I must recognize, like others, but in a particularly acute manner, that I have jacqeus many derirda in naming this thing.

Hent de Vries, Das Schibboleth der Ethik. Derrida und Celan – PhilPapers

I believe that this event is unique in a certain sense. I know that it is unique, derida course. No categories specified categorize this paper.

The Difference Between Gadamer and Derrida. It is not forbidden, naturally, but I do find it disturbing, offensive. It is well known that when one says Auschwitz today, one doesn’t think only of the town which still exists: It’s too little, but too much.


Schibboleth Pour Paul Celan by Jacques Derrida

And then – a question of time, of generation, of time to undo repression, etc. And there, in order to account for the incompatibility of these two accusations, it would be necessary, of course, to analyze the field very attentively. Before beginning this interview, I’d like to insist on one or two schihboleth.

This, then, leads me to your question, why I did not name Auscwitz in this text but I did name it elsewhere, ah well. Archivization preserves, but it also begins to forget. So, I said that it was right and strategically advisable to note first, despite my friendship for Derridq de Man, despite everything I was about to say in this very complicated article, that I can’t summarize here, ajcques it must be made clear that in my view de Man’s attitude was unforgivable.

You’ve said all this very well. I could try to demonstrate, but once more I can’t do it here, not under these conditions, that the concept of survival occupies an altogether particular place in my work.

There is incontestably a generational phenomenon, and surely its marks may be found not only in official political discourses, but even in philosophy. It is a word often abused. Why would it schigboleth be forbidden, to…? Schibbboleth in Create an account. For ten or twelve years European diplomacies, European churches, European universities have, after all, collaborated in their own ways with Nazism.

When I say ‘Yad Vashem’ I mean the problems we’re echibboleth now. Anne-francoise rated it it was amazing Mar 30, I tried to call this axiomatic into question. Naturally, I know what I’m doing when I say, for instance, in La Carte Wchibboleth, that one must practice the holocaust of this or that, that one is to burn schibboletb so on.

Nevertheless, is pardon an imperative? I am not sure I forgive myself for having written this word. It is true that I have constantly tried to work on the question of the signature in philosophy, of the signature and of the date. Edit this record Mark as duplicate Export citation Find it on Scholar Request removal from index Translate to english Revision history.


Schibboleth : para Paul Celan

Anglo-Analytical Philosophy and the Shoah Going back to the question of historicity and a-historicity. Interested in receiving information and updates from Yad Vashem? And I believe that today one cannot burn anything at all, not even a love letter, without thinking about the great Holocaust of this era, not only the gas chambers and the crematoria, but also the burned books, in the beginning of Hitlerism, when they threw all of Freud’s or Kafka’s books and burned them in the public square, this too belonged to the order of holocaust.

This must be explained.

The first is that I wished to make it clear, in the debate that was starting then – it was a vehement debate, with unspeakable suspicions – that in any case I was not going to play down Paul de Man’s offence, that I was as aware of it as the others and that I didn’t mean in what I was doing, what I was trying to do at that moment, and at the moment I wished to take my responsibilities, I didn’t want to be accused of blindness to the gravity of Paul de Man’s offences.

Forgiveness – this is what I tried to show the other night in Jerusalem at the University – pure or unconditional forgiveness must be the event or the act of a grace that cannot be commanded.

Does this judgement imply forgiveness? So what would constitute the singular uniqueness of the Shoah? Having said this, your question was: Going back to the question of historicity and a-historicity. How to communicate the horrific? I’m aware that my formulation is not tight enough. A date is an instant, but it is also a place, it is the irreplaceability of the event. Could one defend such a notion when it seems that once philosophy was actually engaged with its time — during the entre-des-guerres era — it gave support, legitimacy as well as spiritual power, as you yourself put it, to politics?