Title: EWR 21AUG95, Version: , Date: Aug, Status: Active, Desc: EWR EASTERN AND WESTERN RANGE (EWR). Tailored EWR , System Safety Program Plan, Noncompliance Requests, and Launch Complex Safety Training and Certification. Find the most up-to-date version of EWR CONT. DIST. at Engineering
|Country:||Saint Kitts and Nevis|
|Published (Last):||21 July 2018|
|PDF File Size:||17.28 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.64 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
A clear distinction would be made between non-negotiable performance-based requirements and approved methods of compliance that can be waived if esr equally effective alternative is available. The results of safety assessments should not be subjectively altered when making decisions regarding launch, evacuation, or flight termination. Do you enjoy reading reports from the Academies online for free?
The overall modeling and analysis approaches at ER and WR are similar, but some significant differences exist.
Range safety user manual EWR (Eastern and Western Range ) [PDF] – Все для студента
In addition, the safety office could also develop, procure, and certify standard flight safety systems and make them available to users. EWR does not describe the source of most of its requirements. The tailoring process has.
Also, to reduce the need to refer to regulations and instructions issued by other government organizations, many of their requirements were quoted, expanded, or paraphrased and inserted into EWR The Western Range implements this policy by constraining the azimuth of orbital launches. Department of Labor, Environmental Protection Agency, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and the Food and Drug Administration that pertain to individual and collective risks of industrial, occupational, public, and in-the-home accidents, as well as risk levels related to carcinogens RCC, b.
At that time, the MOA specifies that hardware should be ready for flight except for prelaunch processing. Page 14 Share Cite. Based on feedback from you, our users, we’ve made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.
The vehicle must pass through the gate or the flight will be terminated. Answers obtained by applying these analytical methods.
Navy and Air Force, and aircraft flight tests. Following these events, vehicles have historically been quite reliable. Organizational responsibilities for many other range safety processes and procedures, however, are inconsistent with the current memorandum of agreement between AFSPC and AFMC on spacelift roles 127-11 responsibilities.
If downrange tracking is needed for reasons other than risk management, those requirements should be documented. See Primary Recommendation on Roles and Responsibilities, below. Page 25 Share Cite. Information on the FAA licensing process, including relevant eer, regulations, and policies, is available on line http: To ensure safety, range safety tracks each launch vehicle and predicts its instantaneous impact point IIPwhich is a real-time estimate of where the vehicle would land if the flight were terminated.
Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available. While other requirements may exist, from the perspective of launch range safety the Air Force should move the Africa gates to within the limits of uprange flight termination and tracking systems; eliminate the use of assets in Antigua and Ascension for range safety support; and conduct a detailed technical assessment to validate the feasibility of moving other gates uprange.
Users would have the option of 1 implementing the approved method of compliance to streamline the review process, or 2 using an alternate means of compliance, for which users would accept the responsibility for getting approval.
If a vehicle fails to turn downrange by the specified time the flight is terminated. In parallel with this study, SMC, which is part of AFMC, initiated a study to document the sources of requirements, determine which requirements are design solutions, and identify the actual standards represented by design solutions.
These thresholds are ultimately based on impact limit lines ILLswhich extend downrange from the launch site and define the area in which debris from planned stage drops, vehicle explosions, or thrust termination may land.
EWR is issued under the authority of the 30th and 45th wing commanders.
Moving the Africa gates uprange has the potential to reduce the cost of safety-related downrange assets, decrease the complexity of range safety operations, and reduce launch holds and delays. Vehicles that successfully complete uprange staging events are highly reliable, and their IIPs are travelling very fast—much faster even than the vehicles themselves as they approach orbital velocity; the IIP disappears as soon as the vehicle reaches orbital velocity.
Converge the modeling and analysis approaches, tools, assumptions, and operational er used at the Western and Eastern Ranges.
Range safety user manual EWR 127-1 (Eastern and Western Range 127-1)
In a ewf operations command i. The process of revising EWR should include the following steps:. A strict risk avoidance stance—reducing risk to the lowest possible level regardless of cost—would preclude space launch by making it unaffordable.
Login or Register to save! Such changes could render invalid the informed decision process which helps protect the government from liability RCC, a.
Primary Recommendation on EWR This conclusion is supported by calculations of E c during the downrange portion of flight, as noted above.
Looking for other ways to read this?
However, the safety philosophy and practices codified in EWR often go beyond what is necessary to meet that standard. In addition to supporting system program offices and the ranges, the safety office should be responsible for centralizing and simplifying the development of safety policy, procedures, and systems; maintaining a strong engineering, analysis, modeling, and simulation staff through training and career advancement; and reducing costs for the range operators and users.
Also, it should be emphasized that the recommended transfer is about functions—not existing organizations or individuals. Primary Recommendation on Risk Management.