In Gods We Trust has ratings and 23 reviews. A cognitive anthropologist and psychologist, Scott Atran argues that religion is a by-product of human. In got trust. Scott Atran In Gods We Trust The Evolutionary Landscape Of Religion (Evolution And Cognition). Topics atheism. Collection. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Atran, Scott, In gods we trust: the evolutionary landscape of religion / Scott Atran. p. cm. — (Evolution .
|Published (Last):||22 July 2009|
|PDF File Size:||12.59 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.11 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
One face pretends to be humanist and universalist and is intended for show mainly to non-Jews.
Follow the Author
These things being said, I have one medium and one small complaint about this book. Amazon Inspire Digital Educational Resources. The same system results in the perception of figures in the clouds and voices in the wind. Likewise, the bo Published gofsIn Gods We Trust seems to have become something of a standard in books on the development of religion in evolutionary theory.
In Gods We Trust
Mar 15, Nebuchadnezzar rated it it was amazing Shelves: Consistently while reading this book, I felt like Atran was lifting up religion’s skirt to show us its naked psychological underpinnings. How could evolution have favoured wasteful investment in preposterous beliefs?
It tries to answer the age old question of why religion exists and nails it. It is the direct cognitive result of suspending the relevance criteria that universally apply to ordinary communication.
Scott Atran, In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion – PhilPapers
This adds up to making it impossible to think about the necessary issues for myself – except for some glaring examples artan his descriptions of studies in cognition, as already mentioned. That is only made more hods by the fact that sometimes the writing is excellent. I found his accounts quite well balanced and in fact his summaries of both the evolutionary and memetical theories seem very instructive.
These would be the only drawbacks in a book that corrects a fair amount of wrong speculation on this subject.
No keywords specified fix it. Then in next steps he shows how completely wrong it is and how flawed the research behind it really is.
In Gods We Trust: In meditative states, though only one is fully active at one time, BOTH the sympathetic AND the parasympathetic nervous systems are heightened. They are based on a written holy book with a lot of specifically moral content. It seems that he is in the main trying to address contemporary religion, seldom older, never original forms.
In Gods We Trust: Please try again later. In terms of particulars, however, be warned: In the unblinking and forever watchful eyes of God, commitments will be met even at great cost and even when there is no hope of reward. However, much of the book is written in a difficult to read academic style, without the focus of a journal submission.
Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society. He currently directs an international, multidisciplinary project on the natural history of the Lowland Maya. The Trouble with Memes: The book also includes a chapter-length take-down of meme theory, which feels a bit odd considering how fringe it tfust been within academia. Evolutionary Adaptations and By-products 3. End Matter References Index. The Evolution of Religion: Don’t have a Kindle?
Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon. Along the way, Atran provides a number of fascinating experiments, anecdotes, observations, and arguments to make his case and to criticize and critique other theories.
In Gods We Trust – Scott Atran – Oxford University Press
It makes sense that we would evolve this trait, since if you hear a rustle in a bush and you think there is an animal there but it turns out to just be the wind, then no harm done. Atran pieces together data from cognitive psychology, anthropology, and bods fields to elucidate how evolution attran to religion. The Sense of Sacrifice: Print Save Cite Email Share.
But since these important events have no apparent controlling force, they are quickly associated with supernatural agents.
Atran offers an innovative and interesting look at religious thought. For example, an entire chapter is titled ‘The Trouble with Memes,’ and it gently bashes Dawkins, Blackmore, and Dennett, because, in Atran’s opinion: