cro In an excerpt from the book “Best Play: Revolutionary Method for Finding the Strongest Move” Alexander Shashin describes one of the move-choice. In this ambitious and groundbreaking work, physicist and chess master Alexander Shashin presents the fruit of three decades of research into the elements of. A few weeks ago I purchased the book “Best Play: A New Method for Discovering the Strongest Move” by Alexander Shashin. For those of you.
|Published (Last):||2 January 2018|
|PDF File Size:||9.7 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.13 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Remco G 5 years 3 months ago Permalink. As Lpay see it, Sashin’s parameters indeed aren’t meant to tell you who has the better game and by how much, but what they want to make clear is which algorithm you should follow, as playing the wrong algorithm probably will make you lose ground. Skip to main content.
Perhaps then he might have found the move Shashin do not conflict with the criteria of Steinitz.
None of the strongest chessplayers did tell me clearly that he was working using my algorithm, however, I had positive feedback from them. Even if you conclude that this position requires the ‘Tal’ approach, the tactic only works because of the specific characteristics of the position with a black pawn on a5 instead of a6, the tactic wouldn’t have worked. I do see value in the systematic way he evaluates a position to objectively assess how aggressive to be in selecting candidate moves.
We clearly have sshashin material, and an obvious advantage in the time factor. It’s really no “cheap” thinking. It is difficult to shawhin the amount of support he gave me.
I see the future of my method for the generation who is currently years old. It is defined by calculating the center of gravity of a given position.
Vladimir plays worse now than he did five years ago. Great review, thanks as always! How can we tell? Chaos was then outside the law, outside of science. No chance a human could do that sort of thinking and even reach the lower levels on computers. What have we got?
I liked the style of it, because it was more about enthusing, about giving ideas to work with, than about claiming absolute truth. Remarkable that Arne Moll has never heard of Alexander Shashin. That’s why the great Capablanca lost a match to a workaholic like Alekhine, and the year-old Kasparov defeated the mature champion Karpov, which was, in my opinion, an absolutely impossible task.
Who have tested it in practice? You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
A trivial exchange of a bishop for a knight? In ties ,is well known that lasker used to challenge very often,offering sums of money to players in consultation that could defeat him.
The shqshin, game and game! But others have told this story before! Mobility is analogous to the kinetic energy of a system.
alexsnder Shashin is contrary to such problem definition. Many good chess players realized, that main principles of the position game should certainly be observed. Expansion just seems like an extension of mobility. Alexander Shashin “Chess is an inaccurate game! And please, Sir, how do you know it? This in fact happens quite often. This is from the same chapter on Tal:.
: Closed World
Alexander Aleksandrovich as a professional physicist suggested instead of purely chess estimation criteria of Steinitz to use not chess, but physical criteria. Thank you for the warning. Both played not according to Steinitz – ;lay how they played! And during the game your head works better than if you read a book. Giri Blunders, Loses to Karjakin. Academia, shop of chess books, big catalogue, review, news, etc.
You can occupy the space an even concentrate the pieces on one wing, but in that case your opponent will have a higher packing density of pieces than you.