The appellant alleged that Article 45 of the Broadcasting Law (Ley de .. Por lo que el párrafo primero del Art. 45 de la ley y las normas dictadas en su. , Spanish, Book edition: Radiodifusión: marco regulatorio: Ley nacional de radiodifusión 22,, Decreto reglamentario /81 / [Claudio] Schifer. (Law of , InfoLEG, available at (Gustavo Ybarra, El kirchnerismo logró aprobar en general la nueva ley de medios, DIARIO LA.
|Published (Last):||25 September 2005|
|PDF File Size:||16.98 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.56 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
As a second point, there is no doubt that there are many other cases that could have been summarized in this report.
OAS :: Special Rapporteurship for Freedom of Expression
Sergio Israel Dublinsky, a journalist for the periodical publication Brecha was admitted. Article 11 of the Convention further recognizes the protection of the right to privacy and dignity, stating that: On one occasion, television stations were forced to broadcast a minute-long musical performance contained within a cadena nacional. Democratic criteria for the concession of radio and television broadcast frequencies. As a final thought, it will be clear that not all opinions in the decisions quoted are shared by the Office of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression, but that the Office agrees with the fundamentals of the decisions.
In addition, in these cases, it must be proven that in disseminating the news, the social communicator had the specific intent to inflict harm, was fully aware that false news leyy disseminated, or acted with gross negligence in efforts to determine the truth or falsity of such news. The right of expression may not be restricted by indirect methods or means, such as the abuse of government or private controls over newsprint, radio broadcasting frequencies, or equipment used in the dissemination of information, or lsy any other means tending to impede the communication and circulation of ideas and opinions.
Court of Appeals of Santiago de Chile. Restrictions to the free circulation of ideas and opinions, as well as the arbitrary imposition of information and the imposition of obstacles to the free flow of information violate the right to freedom of 22258. Report on the Situation of Human Rights in Mexico. Initially conceived as a form of emergency population warningthese broadcasts are often of a political nature, as most of them are messages by governmental authorities about various topics of general interest.
Texto completo de la Ley Nº , de Radiodifusión | El Cronista
From toVenezuela had an average of cadenas a year. In this section, the report refers to the States’ domestic jurisprudence, and it includes certain decisions by local tribunals that 2225 handed down during and that reflect the importance of respecting freedom of expression as protected in the American Convention.
The Appeals Court of Santiago de Chile rejected the appeal on the grounds that its admittance would have amounted to prior censorship, banned by Article 13 of the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights.
On February 20,the accusation brought by Mr. In several Latin American countries, a cadena nacional “national network”, also referred to as a cadena oficial or red voluntaria is a joint broadcast, over various media usually radio and televisiondirected at the general population of a state. This principle allows only exceptional limitations that must be previously be established by law in case of a real and imminent danger that threatens national security in democratic societies.
Services on Demand Article. All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. Regarding the request for information posed by the complainant, and in order to avoid confusion, it is necessary to point out that it presents two aspects that demand a differentiated solution, namely: The selection has been somewhat arbitrary, both for reasons of space and for lack of sufficient information.
Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 2 above, public entertainments may be subject by law to prior censorship for the sole purpose of regulating access to them for the moral protection of childhood and adolescence.
La “Legitimidad” Del Enunciador Juridico en la Ley de Radiodifusion Argentina (22285/80) (Report)
The law that defined cadenas was derogated in after the constitutional court ruled that they were illegal, violated the right of citizens to “inform and be informed”, and also kept the public in “informational captivity”. The organization of this section takes account, as it must, of the standards arising from interpretation of Article 13 of the Convention, which declares that:.
The Organic Communication Law’s article 74 replaced it, retaining the requirements for broadcasters and extending them to pay television services, which must suspend their own program transmissions to carry cadenas. Many of those standards have been included in the Declaration of Principles on Freedom of Expression.
Consequently, if it is considered that the presentation of the theatrical 2285 in question could entail the applicability of Article In order to illustrate this idea, the Commission pointed out that Article 29 of the American Convention states that “No provision of this Convention shall be interpreted as: The participation of a mutual association in a bidding process with the aim of acquiring a broadcasting license, if it is selected from amongst the bidders, promotes the diversity of lwy which defines a democratic society, and constitutes a true balance to economic groups.
It lacks the legitimacy that should come from the production site, since it wasn’t promulgated by any democratic institution. Views Read Edit View history.
The aforesaid rule has as an exception that operates in the case that there is unequivocal evidence that a political party lye transferred part of its private funds to a privately-owned company. Therefore, if the appeal were admitted and the subsequent exhibitions of the piece which has given rise to it prohibited, this Court would incur in a form of prior censorship, which is forbidden to this Court.
In other words, this section is not a critique of judicial decisions, but rather an attempt to show that in many cases those standards are indeed considered. The constitutional provision is in perfect agreement with international human rights norms which guarantee the right to freedom of expression. One type of cadena nacional is obligatory for all television stations according to the electoral law, the franja electoral or simultaneous transmission of campaign material from the major political parties; this is the only time election campaign ads are broadcast on television.
Dublinsky, of a series of articles portraying the claimant’s involvement in acts of corruption such as requesting the payment of a bribe, and awarding state benefits to his personal acquaintances. Criminal defamation and public officials. In this case, the information would cease to be of a private nature—as is characteristic of a merely contractual relationship—and would become of public interest.
Since Chile’s return to democracy inmost cadenas nacionales have been voluntary in nature, but in the government of Augusto Pinochet and his 22825, stations were obliged to carry these messages.