Aukščiausiasis kasacinis teismas pateikė ataskaitą apie teismų praktikos trūkumus, prokuratūra rengia . Airijoje: kasacinis skundas Aukščiausiajam Teismui. Pursuant to Article § 2, if an appeal (apeliacinis skundas) against the first instance (kasacinis skundas) may be filed with the Supreme Court within three. Netiesioginis priežastinis ryšys (Byla: 3K/) Darbą atliko: Elvina Švambarytė Danel Sabukevič Bylos Šalys: G. P. vs Valstybė.

Author: Tobei Malakazahn
Country: Dominica
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Life
Published (Last): 10 January 2005
Pages: 253
PDF File Size: 1.26 Mb
ePub File Size: 5.58 Mb
ISBN: 182-4-61649-598-4
Downloads: 21257
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zolotaxe

The Union law is not necessary in this case. It means that the same issue of skunfas the Union law may raise in extra-EU arbitration.

You helped to increase the quality of our service. The H ig h Cou rt of Cassation an d J ustic e has the primary responsibility for the unification of jurisprudence. Second, if the EU is allowed to invoke its internal law to invalidate the arbitration awards, then Russia also has the same right.

Foreign investors do not trust the European courts, and they are right. It does not match my search. Please click on the reason for your vote: However, the European Commission takes the radical approach or even a Jihadist approach, and the ECJ ratifies this radical position as its own: What does happen next?

I think that this is sundas very stupid approach. T he case of the so-called “crocodile gang”, the case of the “Margin brothers”, the case of Ilian Varsanov and the case of Dimitar Vuchev. The contribution and disposal operation, which is well-known in practice, has been assimilated by the Court of Cassation to a disposal of assets whenever indicators showed that the two operations were inextricably linked, since in the end their sole aim is the transfer of the assets eur-lex.


There are two important positions that are present in the Achmea judgment: The German Federal Court of Justice decides to transfer the question whether the award is executable to the European Court of Justice, and as I have predicted this is very bad for the investors.

Well, this is true, because the investors do not trust the European courts. The Working Group proposed concrete follow up recommendations: If a legal business generates profit, why should you prevent it from distributing profits? Look skundzs in Linguee Suggest as a translation of “kasacinis” Copy.

Apeliacija (teisė)

The Union law does not regulate this kind of issues. In that video I have predicted that the European Court of Justice would take the position that the Micula brothers should be paid nothing, that the ECJ would prohibit the execution of the award. Therefore, they try to escape from the European courts. In this case, the Slovakian Government behaved in a very stupid way: These cases are now pending appeal at the H ig h Co urt of Cassation an d Ju stic e.

The Micula execution case is still under consideration, however we have got the Achmea case. Tarybos reglamento EEB Nr.

Kasacinis skundas in English with contextual examples

According to the established case law of the Belg ia n Cou rt of Cassationt ax incl ud ing VAT must be established on the basis of the actual facts 9.

These actions include a report on weaknesses in judicial practice b y the Supreme Cou rt of Cassation, work by the Prosecutor’s Office to develop guidelines to analyse acquittals, and inter-agency cooperation agreements between the police and administrative control authorities.


This is a collapse of the whole arbitration system. Under these circumstances, the F re nch C our de Cassation sub mit ted a p reliminary question to the Court on whether the French system was contrary to the provisions of Community law, including the Directive.

Investors want to have independent courts.

Posted by Stanislovas at I myself am a victim of a violation of this principle in France, as I am still being prosecuted by order of the government in an affair in which I have, nonetheless, been proved totally innocent by t he Co urt o f Cassation.

The wrong words are highlighted.

Why do I call this approach Jihadist? Then, the ECJ explains everything it thinks about international arbitration in the same Jihadist manner: This is not a good example for the translation above. Last week, the Ital ia n Cou rt of Cassation de cid ed th at begging by gypsies forms an integral part of the Roma culture and cannot, therefore, be prohibited.

They do not talk about Micula, but we know that they imply Micula, and the breaches of investors rights by the European Commission. This overturning of a ruling and judgment of a case by th e Cou rt of Cassation be cam e par t of our legal history for the first time during the Dreyfus affair.

Thank you very much for your vote!