Annette Kolodny quotes. Quote:”Dancing through the Minefield: Some Observations on the Theory, Practice, and Politics of a Feminist Literary Criticism” . Annette Kolodny. Dancing Through the Minefield: Some Observations on the Theory, practice, and Politics of a Feminist Literary Criticism. Kolodny’s theoretical. Dancing Through the Minefield: Some Observations on the Theory, Practice, and Politics of a Feminist Annette Kolodny – – Feminist Studies 14 (3)
|Published (Last):||23 October 2017|
|PDF File Size:||15.97 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.23 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
But the emphases were different…Avoiding for a time male assertions of a rediscovered Edenwomen claimed the frontiers as a potential sanctuary for an idealized domesticity. Moreover, Kolodny then supports her argument by stating the following: This page was last edited on 29 Augustat Lynda Zwinger – – Hypatia 7 2: Learning how to interpret such as interpretive paradigms or reading techniques a certain text lead us to better understanding of the text, therefore, this will move us to pleasure.
She later sued the University of New Hampshire charging sex discrimination and anti-Semitism. Deconstruction, Feminist Criticism and Cannon Deformation. Through mijefield examination of several male writers, such as Philip FreneauJames Fenimore Cooperand John James AudubonKolodny pursues the implications of this metaphorically female land.
Sign in to use this feature. You are commenting using your Facebook account.
Over the course of her scholarly career, Kolodny has received grants and fellowships from the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Ford Foundation, the Guggenheim Foundation, the Rockefeller Throuugh Fellowship, and others.
Kolodny goes beyond the idea of the ideology that thf happened to our. Because of our changed assumptions, circumstances, and requirements, we get different meanings and interpretations of the same text even if we read the text at different times individually or by groups.
Notify me of new comments via email. Secondly, readers of anneyte “engage…not texts but paradigms. Our reading habits become fixed when we read a particular work of art which stylize our expectations to the others work which follow the first one. For example, the western literary canon has been largely created by well-educated white men, and the focus of the canon is therefore on works by well-educated white daancing.
Although we may be moving forward in terms of feminist literary criticism, and considering the length of time that has passed since Kolodny wrote her article, it seems we still have a long way to go.
Dancing Through the Minefield – J.M. Weselby @ Magpie Creative Writing Services
With these metaphors firmly in sight, the colonists had a framework through which to view the vast stretches of North America as less alien and terrifying. Our understanding of the meaning of any text is a result of our needs and desires as well as our predisposition. The influential magazine Indian Country Today immediately named it as one of the 12 most important books in Native American Studies published in In “Dancing Through the Minefield”, Kolodny applies this theory to the literary canonthose works of literature that are considered appropriate for study.
The Yellow Wall Paper.
We have to establish new norms of evaluation of our works of art by developing our critical methods of evaluation which we used before. There is little sense of the conquering-of-the- frontier mentality that Kolodny discovered in the male writers she discussed in Lay of the Land.
Annette Kolodny – Wikipedia
Since the grounds upon which we assign aesthetic value to texts are never infallible, unchangeable, or universal, we must reexamine not only our aesthetics but, as well, the inherent biases and assumptions informing the critical methods which in part shape our aesthetic responses. Examples of this would include liberal feminismsocialist feminismand ecofeminism. It dnacing the competition between Leif Eiriksson and Christopher Columbus for the title of “first discoverer”.
Reblogged this on honestlyrefreshing and commented: In recent years, the monolithic dacing of the canon has been challenged, and works by previously ignored sections of the literary world women, homosexualsand ethnic minorities have gained some footholds in the canon.
Her major scholarly writings examine the experiences of women on the American frontiers and the projection of female imagery onto the American landscape. After graduation, she took a position on the editorial staff at Newsweek. Insofar as we are taught how to read, what we engage are texts but dahcing.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: It thrrough a book about needed educational innovations in the twenty-first century.
The book is organized chronologically, in much the same way as Lay of the Land. Retrieved January 10, Because of our changed assumption, circumstances, and mienfield, we get different meanings and different interpretations even if we read the same text different times. Rather, they must be taken into the world through activism.
More About Me…
When we read any text, our desires as a female readers enable us to alter and extend what we read. Feminist Criticism in the Wilderness. While the book got positive reviews and pioneered the field of feminist ecocriticismKolodny was denied promotion and tenure in the English Department at the University of New Hampshire. Kolodny suggests that if we are going to establish canon functions, first of all we have to forget our own making. In she was elected to lifetime membership in the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters.
While Kolodny is specifically speaking of feminist literary criticism, I think that all critics can learn from her elevation of truth and mutual understanding over any one particular ideology or strain of an ideology.
Capping what was already a long and distinguished career, in Annette Kolodny published Minefielx Search of Tge Contact: The Eighteenth Century”, discusses the romanticized agrarian and pastoral ideals that coloured the view of America, especially in its comparisons to ideal lands like Elysium and Arcadiaand the consequences that arose from such ideals, such as the exploitation and alteration of the land.
Gardiner, on the other hand, disagrees with Kolodny about the use of pluralism. Kolodny begins her essay by discussing the history of feminist literary criticism and justifying the value of it.
Ackerly – – Cambridge University Press.
Request removal from index.