AKTA SETEM PERINTAH DUTI SETEM (PEREMITAN) PADA menjalankan kuasa yang diberikan oleh subseksyen 80(2) Akta. Sila maklum mengikut Seksyen 57(f) Akta Setem , bayaran balik duti setem boleh dipertimbangkan sekiranya. 20 sesuatu suratcara yang. [EBOOKS] Akta Setem PDF Book is the book you are looking for, Duti Setem Ke Atas Surat Cara Perjanjian Kontrak Pembinaan.
|Published (Last):||9 June 2013|
|PDF File Size:||5.44 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.15 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Charge – No offence disclosed – Defective charge – Charge under s.
Kurnia Insurans Malaysia Berhad v. Arbitration Amendment Act Sustainable Energy Development Authority Act Pleadings – Counterclaim – Amendment – Application to amend statement of defence by adding counterclaim – Filing of amendments – Ruti statute barred – Whether insertion of counterclaim would turn the suit from one character into a suit of another and inconsistent character – Whether counterclaims based on same facts as pleaded in original statement of defence – Whether appellants would suffer prejudice – Limitation Dutjs.
Loan of money – Action to recover – Plaintiff lending money to defendant company in which she was the assistant general manager – Plaintiff contending loan not subject to operation of Limitation Ordinance Cap 49 Sarawak – Whether limitation excluded by shareholders’ resolution – Whether defendant company bound by resolution of holding company – Whether s. Interest – Judgment debt – Plaintiff claimed interest of one per centum per month pursuant to a settlement agreement – Whether contrary to Rules of the High CourtO.
Club – Member – Cessation of plaintiff’s membership – Plaintiff’s past criminal convictions prior to his club membership – Whether r. Trustees – Breach of trust – Construction of trust deed – 1st defendant holding shares in trust for plaintiff – Shares transferred to third parties without consent of cestui cue trust – Whether 1st defendant liable – Whether third parties equally liable Lim Chew Yin v.
Wartha Radju Munisamy v. Syarikat Pendidikan Staffield Bhd v. Perwira Affin Bank Bhd v. Action – Dismissal of – Pleading – Statement of claim adverting to cause of action in negligence – Admission by plaintiff that there was no cause of action in tort against defendant – Effect and repercussion – Whether cause of action in tort abandoned – Whether substratum of claim extirpated – Whether claim to be dismissed Perwira Affin Bank Bhd v.
Law Yew Kwan lwn. Declaration Of Dangerous Pest Lau Lee Sieng v. Buildings – Demolition – Local Government Acts. Judgments and orders – Judgment in default – Setting aside – Whether judgment in default irregular – Writ of summon unsigned, unsealed and undated – Manner of indorsement of writ – Whether vitiated service of writ – Whether prejudice caused to defendants – Filing memorandum of appearance – Whether defendants waived right to challenge validity of writ – Plaintiff claimed severally and jointly against defendants – Whether plaintiff allowed to claim excess of the sum owed – Whether there were grounds to set aside judgment in default MIDF Amanah Ventures Sdn Bhd v.
Drug Dependants Treatment and Rehabilitation Act – Section 20 1 a – Contravention of conditions imposed – Refusal to follow programme for treatment and rehabilitation – Sentence of two years’ imprisonment – Appeal against sentence – Whether sentence manifestly excessive.
Res judicata – Issue estoppel – Same issues canvassed in liability action and recovery action – Motor vehicle accident claim – Liability of vehicle owner established in liability action – Insurer in recovery action seeking to refute liability by reference to exclusion clause in policy – Whether res judicata barred relitigation on liability issue – Whether dduti and recovery actions distinct from each other Letchumanan Gopal v. Supplementary Supply Act Lim Chew Yin v. Vicarious liability – Road accident – Deceased suffering injuries in the course skta travelling in insured’s lorry – Whether deceased was being carried in insured vehicle as a mere passenger – Whether deceased being carried in vehicle in pursuance of a contract of employment with the insured Letchumanan Gopal v.
Pleadings – Counterclaim – Filing of counterclaim – Whether counterclaim deemed to be a separate action – Limitation Acts. Domestic Violence Amendment Bill Sentence – Adequacy – Appeal by public prosecutor – Accused sentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment and 5 strokes of whipping for aggravated rape under ss. Income tax – Companies – Applicant’s sole business to operate and maintain a college – College education provided in exchange for payment – Income not used for segem or beneficent purpose – Whether applicant exempted from tax – Profits could not be distributed to members – Surplus used solely to promote applicant’s objectives – Whether applicant profit oriented organization – Income Tax Exemption No.
Money Services Business Bill Nacap Asia Pacific Sdn Bhd v. Road Transport Amendment Act Notification Of Exemption Under Section 11e. Hukuman – Kesetimpalan – Rompakan – Rompakan malam hari oleh warganegara asing – Hukuman sepuluh tahun penjara dan sepuluh sebatan rotan – Sama ada agak berlebihan – Sama ada perlu diganggui sekadarnya – Kanun Keseksaan, s.
Insurance Exemption No 2 Order Letters of administration – Appointment of caveator – Appeal against appointment of caveator as joint administrator – Whether petitioners and caveator lawful next of kin of deceased and fell within meaning of s. Teh Boon Long v.
SEARCH FOR PERINTAH DUTI SETEM PEREMITANNO 32010 P U A 475 AKTA SETEM 1949 PDF
Employment contract – Wrongful termination – Termination of employment of 1st respondent, a foreigner – Whether 1st respondent a workman within Industrial Relations Act – Whether applicant employer for 1st respondent – Whether Industrial Court had jurisdiction to hear the matter – Whether employment contract illegal Nacap Asia Pacific Sdn Bhd v.
Stamp duty – Refund – Application by purchaser under a terminated sale and purchase agreement for refund of duty paid under s. Sentence – Appeal against sentence dut Principles of sentencing – Plea of guilty – Aita – Punishment – First conviction in State of Kedah – Refusal to undergo rehabilitation as further contempt of order of court – Drug Dependants Treatment and Rehabilitation Acts. Shares – Agreement – Whether defendant held shares on constructive trust for plaintiff – Whether plaintiff could claim equity against defendant in respect of dividends received by defendant – Defendant did ssetem pay purchase price – Whether retention of dividends by defendant amount to unjust enrichment.
Fisheries Amendment Bill Entertainments Duty Exemption No 12 Order Get this bulletin as email by going to http: Renewable Energy Act Not Yet In Force. Not Yet In force. Galaxy Energy Technologies Sdn Bhd v.
See Hua Daily News Berhad. Negligence – Duty of care – Breach of – Defective product causing injury to plaintiff – Whether defendant’s duty of care to ensure product had SIRIM approval – Whether plea of contributory negligence rejected – Whether defendants found to be liable Sundram Veeriah v. Cukai pendapatan – Tuntutan – Tuntutan bayaran cukai belum dibayar – Sama ada penyerahan notis taksiran kepada defendan sempurna – Sama ada cukai yang ditaksirkan menjadi genap masanya dan kena dibayar – Sama ada mahkamah forum yang sesuai untuk memutuskan jumlah cukai dan taksiran yang dibangkitkan – Sama ada taksiran-taksiran adalah konklusif dan muktamad – Sama ada plaintif setdm tuntutan terhadap defendan atas imbangan kebarangkalian – Akta Cukai Pendapatanss.
Industrial Court – Jurisdiction – Termination of employment of 1st respondent, a foreigner – Whether Court had jurisdiction to hear the matter – Whether applicant had demonstrated findings of fact by court palpably perverse – Whether 1st respondent should be afforded protection against unfair dismissal in the event employment contract void Nacap Asia Pacific Sdn 11949 v.
Contract of service – Test for determining whether a person is under a contract of service – Whether person is part and parcel of an organization – Whether person is employed as part of the business Letchumanan Gopal v. Motor insurance – Insurer’s liability – Policy excluding liability to sstem person other than a passenger carried in pursuance of a contract of employment – Deceased suffering injuries in the course of travelling in insured’s lorry – Whether deceased an employee of insured – Deceased a mere passenger – Insurer not liable Letchumanan Gopal v.